Saturday, March 29, 2014

For the sake of public health: please vaccinate



I feel that I am a very open-minded provider, letting patients make empowered decisions regarding their health and choose interventions based on their comfort levels after a thorough discussion of the risks/benefits and informed consent (with thorough documentation on my part).  While I think that patients who decline age-appropriate cancer screening, or parents who decline vitamin K shots for their newborns, are making poor individual choices, their actions have individual and not epidemiological consequences. In contrast, I feel very strongly about the importance of vaccines (which some misguided parents withhold from children too young to decide) and have compiled a series of articles that argue in favor of vaccination, which is, as one author  wrote simply but eloquently, "one of the most unambiguously helpful interventions in the history of modern medicine."

Here is the text of a recent article  by Stephen Luntz posted yesterday by a friend on facebook, which prompted me to blog here, in order to put my articles in one place (and which made me want to move immediately from my hippie county, which has a high number of non-vaccinators, to Croatia).

"Croatia's Constitutional Court has upheld compulsory vaccination laws against nine infectious diseases. The court's statement has been translated as reading, "The child's right to health is more important that the rights of the parents to the (wrong) choice."

Croatia and its neighbor Slovenia have been at the forefront of universal vaccination. While most governments advocate in favor of vaccination, and in some cases provide financial incentives, only a few make childhood vaccination compulsory. 
 
According to a study of 29 European countries, “15 countries do not have any mandatory vaccinations; the remaining 14 countries have at least one mandatory vaccination included in their program”. Moreover, most of these do not enforce the laws, provide extensive opt-out clauses, or make vaccination universal only against a small number of diseases.
 
Since Croatia  made vaccinations universal in 1999 diphtheria, whooping cough and measles have disappeared entirely and tuberculosis has decreased by 93%, tetanus by 97% and hepatitis B by 65%.
 
Possibly because of this success, however, Croatia has experienced substantial resistance to what was once an uncontroversial policy. Having achieved universal vaccination for a decade (presumably excluding cases where there was a valid medical reason) 28 children went unvaccinated in 2012, according to official records, and in 2013 this climbed to 143. While these numbers are not enough to generate the sorts of outbreaks seen in the US and UK as a result of campaigns by anti-vax lobbyists, the direction is clear.
 
The potential scale of the revolt is indicated by 10,000 people signing a petition claiming, "the vaccination of healthy children poses a threat to their health." Inevitably the law was challenged in court, but the highest court in the land has now endorsed it. The decision has been hailed by the Croatian Medical Association and the Croatian Institute for Public Health.
 
The implications of a let up in vaccination regimes can be seen in Syria where the war has interrupted the childhood immunization program. As a result polio, recently confined to just three countries, is now spiraling out of control in Syria. Children, including those who make it to refugee camps in surrounding countries, are being sentenced to lifelong paralysis.
 
Failing to vaccinate a child against a transmissible disease is analogous to strapping a bomb to their chest and sending them out in public – if something triggers an explosion they are the most likely one to die, but there is a substantial risk everyone close to them will get hurt as well."

YES.


Here's a really thought-provoking article which really hit home for me-- which includes a discussion of the ethics of declining to accept children to your practice whose parents don't vaccinate, and asks "If you won’t trust your doctors on vaccinating your kids, will you ever really trust them at all?"

Here is a great article debunking common vaccine myths (especially the one that the MMR vaccine causes autism [thank you, Jenny McCarthy], which is not only based on a completely falsified [and retracted] study, but which has unfortunately created so much public panic that the safety of other vaccines has been called into question by paranoid parents). This panic is why we are now having measles exposures and outbreaks in this country including in Oakland from an infected BART-rider, Orange County, and in New York.

Here are some visual maps showing the trend in recent years of the spread of vaccine-preventable illnesses across the world. If some of these parents could just witness firsthand some of the devastating cases of tetanus, polio, pertussis, diphtheria, and the like across the globe (or really talk to their grandparents), they may be awoken from complacency and change their minds.   They need also to understand that outbreaks are happening because we are losing the "herd immunity" benefit of vaccination (that the more immune people there are, the less likely an infectious disease is to spread, even among unvaccinated/susceptible people).

California's "personal belief exemption" is really scary, especially as I live in the state, and we see active whooping cough outbreaks (preventable by DTaP/TDaP). TDaP is recommended for all adults one-time, and all pregnant women between 27-36 weeks in each pregnancy (regardless of past vaccination history and regardless of pregnant women's hesitancy to be vaccinated) to mainly reduce the risk of newborn pertussis disease, which can be devastating and deadly and which you can read about here where two previously-indifferent or unaware moms talk about their personal experience with pertussis (diphtheria, also prevented by DTaP, is very rare in this age, due to vaccination, although devastating back in the day). I personally feel that children should, without question, be forced to be vaccinated in order to attend school (or any public place, really, in case everyone just decides to home-school, although the latter is not really enforceable).

In case people perceive that it's just doctors who favor and are pushing vaccines, here is a very well-written article by Lisa Murakami, a layperson, which every parent should read.

While I don't agree with Dr. Sears (nor do most medical professionals) and "alternative" vaccine schedules only delay needed immunity, it is better to do some vaccines than none, and I work with parents who, while reluctant, are trying to compromise with me (with me hoping that I can ultimately convince them of the *right* thing to do). I agree that the hepatitis B vaccine (in the absence of maternal exposure history) and perhaps polio (which was eradicated from the US thirty years ago because of vaccination, although a polio-like illness has been recently found to be affecting kids in California) are less immediately important than the "2, 4, and 6 month" HIB, pneumococcus,  rotavirus, and DTaP (and influenza, in children older than 6 months) vaccines, for those infants who are not imminently leaving the country. However, if we have an effective and well-studied combination vaccine (like Pediarix-- DTaP/polio/Hep B) that includes them, it boggles my mind why a sane parent who loves their child would decline these, as the child would get the same number of "pokes" and no increase in adverse effects.

I routinely give all parents the following resources to review to encourage them to make the decision to vaccinate:
http://vaccinateyourbaby.org/
Http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/index.html
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/parent-questions.html
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/additives.htm
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/patient-ed/conversations/prevent-diseases/provider-resources-factsheets-infants.html

So yes, vaccines cause transient pain-- children cry for a few seconds when they get poked with needles, and it's not uncommon to have a mild local vaccine reaction or even a fever in the 24 hours after vaccines. And until their child has serious complications or dies from an illness that is preventable (or sees cases in other parts of the world where, unfortunately, access to vaccines is limited and mass-vaccination is not feasible), parents may feel comfortable assuming the risk of letting their children going unvaccinated. However, while perhaps deferring vaccines just (in a harsh, blunt way) allows natural selection to take its course for those children (but not actually the parents who made the poor choice), it is still not fair that some parents are putting others' children at risk who didn't make the choice or aren't eligible for vaccines due to immunosuppression or allergies, and that these misguided parents are creating a public health hazard.

Again, "Failing to vaccinate a child against a transmissible disease is analogous to strapping a bomb to their chest and sending them out in public – if something triggers an explosion they are the most likely one to die, but there is a substantial risk everyone close to them will get hurt as well."

If I had a child (as I tell my patients/parents), I would vaccinate him/her without hesitation for every disease for which we had an immunization, and would be tempted (especially where we live now!) to keep him/her away from playgrounds, churches, and even schools where the other disease-carriers are running around (although I believe in public education). Or move to Croatia where they seem to have gotten things right.
Croatia's Constitutional Court has upheld compulsory vaccination laws against nine infectious diseases. The court's statement has been translated as reading, “The child’s right to health is more than the rights of parents to the (wrong) choice.” 
 
Croatia and its neighbor Slovenia have been at the forefront of universal vaccination. While most governments advocate in favor of vaccination, and in some cases provide financial incentives, only a few make childhood vaccination compulsory. 
 
According to a study of 29 European countries, “15 countries do not have any mandatory vaccinations; the remaining 14 countries have at least one mandatory vaccination included in their program”. Moreover, most of these do not enforce the laws, provide extensive opt-out clauses, or make vaccination universal only against a small number of diseases.
 
Since Croatia  made vaccinations universal in 1999 diphtheria, whooping cough and measles have disappeared entirely and tuberculosis has decreased by 93%, tetanus by 97% and hepatitis B by 65%.

Read more at http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/croatian-court-upholds-vaccine-mandate#zP8PfsKkWFW6vrfW.99
Croatia's Constitutional Court has upheld compulsory vaccination laws against nine infectious diseases. The court's statement has been translated as reading, “The child’s right to health is more than the rights of parents to the (wrong) choice.” 
Croatia and its neighbor Slovenia have been at the forefront of universal vaccination. While most governments advocate in favor of vaccination, and in some cases provide financial incentives, only a few make childhood vaccination compulsory. 
According to a study of 29 European countries, “15 countries do not have any mandatory vaccinations; the remaining 14 countries have at least one mandatory vaccination included in their program”. Moreover, most of these do not enforce the laws, provide extensive opt-out clauses, or make vaccination universal only against a small number of diseases.
Since Croatia  made vaccinations universal in 1999 diphtheria, whooping cough and measles have disappeared entirely and tuberculosis has decreased by 93%, tetanus by 97% and hepatitis B by 65%.
Possibly because of this success, however, Croatia has experienced substantial resistance to what was once an uncontroversial policy. Having achieved universal vaccination for a decade (presumably excluding cases where there was a valid medical reason) 28 children went unvaccinated in 2012, according to official records, and in 2013 this climbed to 143. While these numbers are not enough to generate the sorts of outbreaks seen in the US and UK as a result of campaigns by anti-vax lobbyists, the direction is clear.
The potential scale of the revolt is indicated by 10,000 people signing a petition claiming, "the vaccination of healthy children poses a threat to their health." Inevitably the law was challenged in court, but the highest court in the land has now endorsed it. The decision has been hailed by the Croatian Medical Association and the Croatian Institute for Public Health.
The implications of a let up in vaccination regimes can be seen in Syria where the war has interrupted the childhood immunization program. As a result polio, recently confined to just three countries, is now spiraling out of control in Syria. Children, including those who make it to refugee camps in surrounding countries, are being sentenced to lifelong paralysis.
Failing to vaccinate a child against a transmissible disease is analogous to strapping a bomb to their chest and sending them out in public – if something triggers an explosion they are the most likely one to die, but there is a substantial risk everyone close to them will get hurt as well.

Read more at http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/croatian-court-upholds-vaccine-mandate#zP8PfsKkWFW6vrfW.99
Croatia's Constitutional Court has upheld compulsory vaccination laws against nine infectious diseases. The court's statement has been translated as reading, “The child’s right to health is more than the rights of parents to the (wrong) choice.” 
Croatia and its neighbor Slovenia have been at the forefront of universal vaccination. While most governments advocate in favor of vaccination, and in some cases provide financial incentives, only a few make childhood vaccination compulsory. 
According to a study of 29 European countries, “15 countries do not have any mandatory vaccinations; the remaining 14 countries have at least one mandatory vaccination included in their program”. Moreover, most of these do not enforce the laws, provide extensive opt-out clauses, or make vaccination universal only against a small number of diseases.
Since Croatia  made vaccinations universal in 1999 diphtheria, whooping cough and measles have disappeared entirely and tuberculosis has decreased by 93%, tetanus by 97% and hepatitis B by 65%.
Possibly because of this success, however, Croatia has experienced substantial resistance to what was once an uncontroversial policy. Having achieved universal vaccination for a decade (presumably excluding cases where there was a valid medical reason) 28 children went unvaccinated in 2012, according to official records, and in 2013 this climbed to 143. While these numbers are not enough to generate the sorts of outbreaks seen in the US and UK as a result of campaigns by anti-vax lobbyists, the direction is clear.
The potential scale of the revolt is indicated by 10,000 people signing a petition claiming, "the vaccination of healthy children poses a threat to their health." Inevitably the law was challenged in court, but the highest court in the land has now endorsed it. The decision has been hailed by the Croatian Medical Association and the Croatian Institute for Public Health.
The implications of a let up in vaccination regimes can be seen in Syria where the war has interrupted the childhood immunization program. As a result polio, recently confined to just three countries, is now spiraling out of control in Syria. Children, including those who make it to refugee camps in surrounding countries, are being sentenced to lifelong paralysis.
Failing to vaccinate a child against a transmissible disease is analogous to strapping a bomb to their chest and sending them out in public – if something triggers an explosion they are the most likely one to die, but there is a substantial risk everyone close to them will get hurt as well.

Read more at http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/croatian-court-upholds-vaccine-mandate#zP8PfsKkWFW6vrfW.99

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Salted Caramel Encore: Brownies


I have gotten on a bit of a baking (specifically salted-caramel-baking) kick lately (recall the salted caramel butter bars recipe a month or so back). I definitely do love the combination of sweet and salty. Here's a recipe I made this past weekend (not sure where I saw the initial recipe-- FB?, but you can find it at bestyummyrecipes.com.) While the caramel/butterscotch sauce I used was a bit too runny, leaving the top very gooey (and best eaten in scoops rather than cut into individual bars), these still tasted delicious!

Ingredients

  • 1 box Betty Crocker fudge brownies (for a 9×13 pan)
  • 2 eggs
  • 1/4 cup water
  • 2/3 cup vegetable oil
  • 3 cups pretzels
  • 1 jar caramel sauce
  • coarse sea salt

Directions

  1. Preheat oven to 350 degrees F. Line a 9×13-inch baking pan with parchment paper, or grease with cooking spray.
  2. Prepare brownie batter according to package instructions.
  3. Pour about 1/3 of the brownie batter into the prepared baking pan. Spread until the bottom of the pan is evenly coated. Then add two even layers of pretzels, covering the entire surface. Carefully spoon the remaining brownie batter on top to cover the pretzels.
  4. Bake for 30 minutes, or until a toothpick inserted in the middle of the brownies comes out clean. Remove and set on a cooling rack to cool.
  5. Spoon the caramel sauce onto the top of the brownies in an even layer. (If it is too thick, spoon the sauce into a small bowl first and microwave for 30 seconds to thin.) Sprinkle the caramel with sea salt.
  6. Serve warm, or let cool to room temperature and then serve.
(shot of insulin optional). MMM!

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Godmothers are the best!


It's not a secret that I have been feeling overburdened and overwhelmed at work the past few months. My godmother Inara apparently "got word" and recently sent me this awesome care package, including oatmeal/chocolate chip cookies, herbal teas, and a cute card featuring a polarbear.

It totally made my day/week.  While I enjoyed some good rest this weekend, I am looking forward to using this tea, and cutting down on some hours, in the near future.  What's the best thing you do to relax?

Monday, March 17, 2014

so many books, so little time...




Sigh.  

As many of you know, reading is one of my greatest loves (besides sports-watching and spending time with family, of course...). With some of my hours recently pushing residency-type-hours, medical journals begging for my attention, several sporting events on TV, and Oscar-worthy movies to catch on Netflix, I have neglected my reading recently. Friends have given me a few books to read, I've gotten some from the library, and there are some we own that I want to read.... however, I have just not been able to find the time! 

This is what my current bedside table looks like (a.k.a "the stack" which is danger of toppling over!)

With our trip to Asia approaching in April, I'd like to get in some of my "context" reading (i.e. books set in China/Korea)... but have had difficulty with all the choices above! If only I could quit my *day* job to focus full-time on reading... :). I have a whole "wishlist" on Amazon of "Books to read" (not that I'd buy them) which seems to grow longer by the day, so not that I need more ideas... but I'm always looking for suggestions of "good reads."  While I used to be a bit of a fiction snob, now I read absolutely anything and everything.

Read any fabulous books lately?

Thursday, March 13, 2014

BNP Paribas: Tennis Dream




On Sunday before we left OC, we drove to Indian Wells to catch some of the BNP Paribas (which, French, I learned is pronounced par-ee-bah) Open. We were lucky that the tennis tournament's early rounds coincided with our travel down south for Rosha's wedding. While I have watched some professional live tennis before, at Washington D.C.'s Legg Mason, I haven't been to any pro matches any time recently and this was a great tournament to see, with really nice grounds, and where lots of the top players come out.  It was a fabulous day-- give me sunshine, warmth (it was 80 degrees in the desert) and all-day tennis-spectating, and I couldn't be a happier girl. While I would have loved to watch Federer (before he retires), my Stan "the Man" Wawrinka, Djokovic, or Li Na, they weren't playing during that day session so I had to settle for these billboards...

Li Na

The Swiss Dream Team

Sort-of-rivals even though Nadal owns RF

The Djoker

Nadal (who I don't root for)


Johnny Mac Mural

Tennis ball drinking bottle!

Our stadium 1 tickets allowed us to sit in "general seating" in other stadiums, so we wandered around and caught parts of several matches.

We first watched a really good three-set match between Simona Halep (the winner) and Lucie Safarova.



We watched a bit of Isner-Davydenko but bored easily with the shorter men's points



We watched a really good and tight final set between Alize Cornet (W) and Carla Suarez-Navarro


... and watched the Canadian darling of the Aussie Open, Eugenie ("Genie") Bouchard destroy Sara Errani.

Caroline Wozniaki (def Shvedova)

We would love to go back to Indian Wells and catch some more of the tournament another year-- I'd highly recommend this tourney to any tennis-lover!

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

While we were gone (earthquakes and hunger strikes!)

1) Earthquake!
 Source: http://kymkemp.com/2014/mar/9/eathquake/ 
Thanks to Alyssa for posting the pic first

On Sunday night, a 6.9 earthquake hit Humboldt County (well, the ocean off the coast of Humboldt County... which you can read about here). On Monday, we received many concerned e-mails, text and FB posts from friends (THANK YOU!) "hoping we were ok." We were actually still in Orange County at the time of the quake, but hear from friends and colleagues that were "local" that the shaking (which were probably only like a 3 or 4 on the Richter scale "in town") lasted quite a long time, 20 seconds or so, and there were many aftershocks for the succeeding 12 hours. The last earthquake I felt was in 2012, with its epicenter about 90 miles from Arcata in Hoopa. I remember being a part of a 7.4 earthquake in San Diego in the 1990s, which was pretty wild! While thankfully there we no tsunami-implications from this quake (and our TV and other important/fragile objects were intact when we returned from SoCal), it does remind us that, while California is pretty great in terms of weather (at least in the southern and central parts... Arcata does leave a lot of warmth to be desired... but no polar vortexes here), we do have the potential for catastrophic natural disasters!


2) Hunger, thirst, and elimination strike
We brought Pepper to Orange County with us this past weekend both because we love her and miss her when we're gone, but also because we haven't figured out the dog-sitting backup plan now that trusty and beloved Elise is now in SoCal. While you may think we are overprotective parents and are feeding into the problem (?severe social or separation anxiety), I'm not sure how to get Pep to act like a "normal dog" in our absence.

She does fine when we leave her and go to work (I used to feel really guilty going to work and leaving her home alone), although we're always met with frantic exuberance when we return . We've tried to bring her to a local doggie day care a few times, but she just sits in the corner and shakes...so she obviously enjoys and prefers being in her "own place" alone to in a "new place" with strangers.
She doesn't warm up quickly to new people and is very cautious and introverted, more so than any dog I have ever known/owned.

When we've gone out of town for an extended period (i.e. out of the country on vacation), Elise has come over to our house to dog/house sit for us. She tells us that Pepper usually refuses to eat for a day or so, and sleeps by the floormat behind the front door for the first night or so, waiting and hopeful we'll return. However, after a couple of days, she seems to get over it and spends time upstairs. But now Elise has moved on :(. We have never placed Pepper in a kennel, which we fear would be devastating to her.

When we left Pep with K's parents and sister to go to the wedding on Saturday (planning to stay away in San Diego overnight), we didn't think much of it. They've walked her before in our absence. When we were in McLean for Thanksgiving, my parents walked her without a problem when we were out and about. However, this time, Pepper went on a major strike. While she has been known to be "mopey" when we're gone and lose her appetite, this time she ignored her food (including snacks!) and water, and... refused to pee.  Katherine said she took her outside about 5 times and up to 20 min at a time,  starting 7-8 hours after she's last gone out... and she refused to go to the bathroom. She held it in for 17 hours ... until we returned from the wedding and walked her ourselves.

Here is " Ms. Mopey McMoperson," as we call her (on her bed on top of a tarp K's parents placed in case she accidentally peed in the house because she refused to go outside)

Ignoring food... (check out the snack stick behind her)

We know that probably "the worst thing that could happen" in our absence would be for Pepper to have an accident or something. I really don't think she'd starve herself to death. But it's actually our perception of her stress and sadness when "abandoned" that makes us reluctant to leave her ... and simultaneously eager for a solution!  I have read several doggie psychology books and watched a lot of Cesar Milan: Dog Whisperer. Do you think she'd just "get over" being in new places and with new people if we did it or left her more often? Do you think she'd ever get "used" to being kenneled? Do you think we're being *those* overprotective parents who are feeding into her fears (even though I really feel that if I had a child I'd have more of a "get over it" approach to parenting)? Is it ok to treat a furry *family member* who we love so much with extra care, if we have the means and money (see some dog-owner commandments here)? Are there any ideas from the dog-behavior experts out there of how to help her be happier/less anxious... or shall we, in the future, just let her "deal with it" and not worry so much?

Monday, March 10, 2014

Persian Love



On Saturday, we left OC to drive to San Diego to celebrate the wedding of Rosha, a good friend from residency at UC Davis (who left to complete traditional psychiatry at UCLA and then a fellowship in NY, where she met her now-husband, Ahson).

We took some pre-wedding photos in K's parents' backyard. Ah, how I love sunshine and sundresses in March! :)



We first dropped Theresa back off at UCSD, where she has a few months left until graduation. She showed us this sculpture "Fallen Star" (a house at an angle perched on the existing Engineering building) completed in 2011... which you can enter (although we didn't have time to do so).



Here is us by a Dr. Seuss statue by the Geisel Library.

We then headed to the Westin downtown for our first Persian wedding!


In the hall was the glittery "Sofreh," a kind of altar which contains food and symbolic items for the couple's future. There was a Koran, as well as "Mirror of Fate," foods like nuts and eggs representing fertility, and gold coins to symbolize wealth. There was definitely a lot of sparkle!!




the groom with his parents

Rosha's sister Roxana

The beautiful bride with her parents


Special moment


They looked so happy!


sorry for the blurry photos!


Sugar cones "Kalleh Ghand" are ground over the couple, to "shower them with the sweetness of marriage"



Towards the end of the ceremony, the bride and groom each dip their pinky in honey and feed it to their new spouse

Exchange of rings...

... and more bling (relatives of the couple also showered them [well, mostly Rosha] with jewelry!)

With the gorgeous bride!

We found some familiar UCD faces!

Here's us with Kelvin's "twin" Charles (Vu), an ER doc, and his wife, Khoa-Linh, an OBGYN
 (Vu doctors x4!)


The food was excellent, the music wonderful (Persians love to dance!), and although the 2:00 a.m. curfew was way too late for us (especially with the daylight savings time change!), we had a fabulous time at the wedding! Congrats, Rosha and Ahson!